Honey Intelligence Dashboard β Complete 31-section beekeeping producers survey, Uttar Pradesh
π
Honey Intelligence DashboardBeekeeping Producers Survey Β· UP Β· 31 Sections
Survey overview
At a glance β all 31 sections
π§βπΎ
10,482
Total beekeepers
74% NBB registered
π―
48,300 T
Total honey output
β 12% YoY
π°
βΉ72.6K
Avg annual income
57% profit margin
π
2.4 M
Active colonies
Avg 229 / producer
π
75
Districts covered
Full UP
β οΈ
14.2%
Avg loss rate
β +2.1pp
Honey output trend β 2021 to 2023
Quarterly production in thousand tonnes
Top districts by colony count
Section 1.4 Γ 3.1 β thousands
Sales channel 2023
Sec 13.5
Section 1 β Producer demographics
Who are the beekeepers?
π€
10,482
Registered producers
π
41 yrs
Average age
Range 18β80
Marital status (sec 1.12)
Main occupation (sec 1.14)
Sections 1.13 Β· 1.14 Β· 2 β Family demographics & land use
Household structure and land holdings
Family size distribution (sec 1.13)
Average members per household
Family labor in beekeeping (sec 1.14.1β3)
Land ownership type (sec 2)
% of respondents with each land category
Irrigation source (sec 2.A.4)
Sections 3 Β· 4 Β· 5 Β· 6 β Colony setup & source
Colony ownership and acquisition
2.4 M
Total colonies
Avg 229/producer
38%
Started via Govt/NGO
Sec 4
How beekeeping was started (sec 4)
Colony source type (sec 6)
Colony ownership size (sec 3.1)
Section 7 β Beekeeping operations
How beekeeping is conducted
55%
Full-time
Primary livelihood
44%
Migrate colonies
Sec 7.1
18 kg
Avg honey/box
Sec 7.2
Migration frequency (sec 7.1.1)
Honey per box per harvest (sec 7.2)
Section 8 β Production details
What is being produced
48,300 T
Total honey 2021β23
βΉ212/kg
Avg honey price 2023
β from βΉ186
22%
Below 15 kg benchmark
Sec 8.1.2.4
Honey varieties (sec 8.1.1)
Co-product adoption (sec 8.1.3β7)
Section 9 β Cost of production
Fixed cost, variable cost & profit
βΉ31.2k
Avg variable cost
Variable cost breakdown (sec 9.1.7β25)
Processing cost tier (sec 18)
Own capital: 74%
Borrowed: 26%
Profit margin: 57%
Sections 10 Β· 11 Β· 12 β Losses, protection & pest management
Production losses and risk mitigation
Natural calamity types (sec 10.1.1)
Disease & pest types (sec 10.1.2)
Pest management methods (sec 12)
68% adopt protection Β· 32% do not
Empty boxes (sec 11): 39% have unused hives
Adopt protection: 68%
Section 13 β Selling details 2021 Β· 2022 Β· 2023
Sales channels, prices and buyer companies
Top honey processing buyers 2023 (sec 13.5.17)
% of honey sold to named companies
Section 14 β Co-product selling details 2021 Β· 2022 Β· 2023
Beeswax Β· Pollen Β· Royal Jelly Β· Propolis Β· Venom
Co-product seller % by year
% of producers who sold each co-product
Co-product sales channels (sec 14)
Where co-products are sold
Personal use (no sale): 18% of beeswax
Section 15 β Post-harvest grading & branding
Grading, packaging and brand quality
54%
Do post-harvest grading
3
Max branding tiers
Sec 15.3β15.5
Pack sizes sold (sec 15.3.4β6)
% of branded producers using each weight
Honey color grades sold (sec 15.3.7β12)
% of graded producers by color category
Brand type distribution
Section 16 β Training & capacity building
Training coverage, topics and providers
62%
Formal training
of trained producers
4.3 days
Avg training length
Training topics received (sec 16.1β16.4)
Section 17 β Honey processing unit operations
Who operates their own processing unit
23%
Own processing unit
Sec 17
4,800 kg
Avg processing capacity
3,200 kg
Avg processed qty
βΉ14/kg
Avg processing cost
Selling place for processed honey (sec 17.1.4)
Honey variety processed (sec 17.3)
Sections 19 Β· 20 β Export of honey and co-products
Within-state, interstate and international exports
Honey export reach (sec 19)
Co-product export (sec 20)
Sections 21 Β· 30 β Market competition & contract farming
Competition type, contracts and benefits
74%
Report contract benefits
Market competition type (sec 21)
Contract benefits received (sec 30.5)
Sections 22 Β· 23 Β· 24 Β· 25 Β· 26 Β· 27 Β· 28 β Schemes, challenges & quality factors
Government support, obstacles and knowledge
Scheme awareness & benefit uptake (sec 22)
Among all 10,482 respondents
| Scheme | Aware | Registered | Benefit taken | Reach |
| National Beekeeping Mission | 72% | 48% | 31% | High |
| Sweet Revolution (KVIC) | 61% | 34% | 22% | Medium |
| Honey FPO (NAFED) | 44% | 19% | 12% | Medium |
| KVK (Krishi Vigyan Kendra) | 55% | 28% | 18% | Medium |
| Dev of Bee Breeders | 33% | 11% | 7% | Low |
| MIDH (Horticulture) | 39% | 14% | 9% | Low |
| Sphoorti (MSME) | 28% | 9% | 5% | Very low |
| State Industrial Dev Mission | 24% | 7% | 4% | Very low |
Horticulture dept help types (sec 23)
Major obstacles faced (sec 25)
Factors affecting honey production (sec 26)
Factors affecting honey quality (sec 28)
Section 29 β Pollination services
Colonies rented out for pollination purposes
31%
Provide pollination
Extra income stream
βΉ1,200
Avg rental / colony
Crop type pollinated (sec 29.1)
Factors affecting bees (sec 27)
Section 31 β Variety-wise sales
Sales broken down by honey variety
68%
Report variety-wise sales
5
Max variety slots (31.1β31.5)
βΉ248/kg
Highest variety avg price
Litchi honey
Volume share by variety (sec 31)
Average price per variety (Rs/kg)
Complete variable reference β all 31 sections Β· 450+ fields
Search and explore every survey variable
Total: 450+ variables
Sections: 31
Calculated fields: 24
Branching logic: 180+ fields