Honey Intelligence Dashboard β€” Complete 31-section beekeeping producers survey, Uttar Pradesh

Survey overview
At a glance β€” all 31 sections
πŸ§‘β€πŸŒΎ
10,482
Total beekeepers
74% NBB registered
🍯
48,300 T
Total honey output
↑ 12% YoY
πŸ’°
β‚Ή72.6K
Avg annual income
57% profit margin
🐝
2.4 M
Active colonies
Avg 229 / producer
πŸ“
75
Districts covered
Full UP
⚠️
14.2%
Avg loss rate
↑ +2.1pp
Honey output trend β€” 2021 to 2023
Quarterly production in thousand tonnes
Output rising 2021–2023.
Top districts by colony count
Section 1.4 Γ— 3.1 β€” thousands
Varanasi
92k
Lucknow
84k
Prayagraj
76k
Gorakhpur
71k
Agra
64k
Meerut
58k
Beekeeping type
Sec 6
Modern (63%)
Traditional (24%)
Transitional (13%)
Engagement level
Sec 7
Full-time (55%)
Part-time (28%)
Hobby (17%)
Sales channel 2023
Sec 13.5
Processing
42%
Retailer
28%
Consumer
18%
Local shop
8%
Fair / expo
4%
Section 1 β€” Producer demographics
Who are the beekeepers?
πŸ‘€
10,482
Registered producers
πŸ“…
41 yrs
Average age
Range 18–80
πŸ’
82%
Married
πŸŽ“
31%
Graduate+
πŸ“ž
98%
Have mobile
πŸ“‹
74%
NBB registered
Gender (sec 1.8)
Male (76%)
Female (24%)
Religion (sec 1.9)
Hindu
72%
Muslim
18%
Sikh
6%
Christian
4%
Caste (sec 1.10)
General
34%
OBC
42%
SC
18%
ST
6%
Education (sec 1.11)
Graduate+
31%
High school
19%
Secondary
21%
Primary
18%
Uneducated
11%
Marital status (sec 1.12)
Married
82%
Unmarried
13%
Widow/er
5%
Main occupation (sec 1.14)
Agriculture
58%
Animal husb.
19%
Private job
11%
Trade
8%
Other
4%
Sections 1.13 Β· 1.14 Β· 2 β€” Family demographics & land use
Household structure and land holdings
Family size distribution (sec 1.13)
Average members per household
1.8
Men / HH
1.4
Women / HH
1.2
Children / HH
Family labor in beekeeping (sec 1.14.1–3)
Men working
Avg 1.8
Women working
Avg 0.9
Children working
Avg 0.2
Land ownership type (sec 2)
% of respondents with each land category
Own land
68%
Leased in
29%
Leased out
18%
Fallow land
14%
Irrigation source (sec 2.A.4)
Tubewell pvt
44%
Tubewell govt
22%
Canal
18%
Pond / well
11%
Pumping set
5%
Sections 3 Β· 4 Β· 5 Β· 6 β€” Colony setup & source
Colony ownership and acquisition
2.4 M
Total colonies
Avg 229/producer
β‚Ή3,800
Avg cost/colony
4.2
Avg hives/box
2019
Median start year
38%
Started via Govt/NGO
Sec 4
How beekeeping was started (sec 4)
Govt / NGO gift
38%
Inheritance
27%
Market purchase
22%
Forest / wild
8%
Flock catching
3%
Backyard / courtyard
2%
Colony source type (sec 6)
Modern box
63%
Traditional
24%
Transitional
13%
Colony ownership size (sec 3.1)
1–50
34%
51–200
38%
201–500
19%
500+
9%
Section 7 β€” Beekeeping operations
How beekeeping is conducted
55%
Full-time
Primary livelihood
28%
Part-time
44%
Migrate colonies
Sec 7.1
18 kg
Avg honey/box
Sec 7.2
2.3Γ—
Avg migrations/yr
Migration frequency (sec 7.1.1)
Once/year
48%
Twice/year
37%
3+ times
15%
Honey per box per harvest (sec 7.2)
Under 10 kg
12%
10–15 kg
22%
15–20 kg
38%
20–30 kg
21%
Over 30 kg
7%
Section 8 β€” Production details
What is being produced
48,300 T
Total honey 2021–23
β‚Ή212/kg
Avg honey price 2023
↑ from β‚Ή186
22%
Below 15 kg benchmark
Sec 8.1.2.4
41%
Sell beeswax
19%
Collect pollen
8%
Royal jelly
Honey varieties (sec 8.1.1)
Mustard
72%
Litchi
38%
Eucalyptus
24%
Sunflower
16%
Others
9%
Co-product adoption (sec 8.1.3–7)
Honey
100%
Beeswax
41%
Pollen
19%
Propolis
12%
Royal jelly
8%
Venom
3%
Section 9 β€” Cost of production
Fixed cost, variable cost & profit
β‚Ή18.4k
Avg fixed cost
β‚Ή31.2k
Avg variable cost
β‚Ή41.4k
Avg net profit
Variable cost breakdown (sec 9.1.7–25)
Unskilled labour
24%
Skilled labour
18%
Raw material
16%
Sugar suppl.
14%
Transport
11%
Pest mgmt
9%
Packing
5%
Misc.
3%
Processing cost tier (sec 18)
Under β‚Ή5 lakh
61%
β‚Ή5–10 lakh
24%
β‚Ή10–20 lakh
10%
Over β‚Ή20 lakh
5%
Own capital: 74%
Borrowed: 26%
Profit margin: 57%
Sections 10 Β· 11 Β· 12 β€” Losses, protection & pest management
Production losses and risk mitigation
8.4%
Natural calamity
3.2%
Disease & pest
2.8%
Post-harvest pkg
1.6%
Wild animals
1.4%
Transport loss
1.0%
Chemical effects
0.6%
Crystallisation
0.4%
Hive destruction
Natural calamity types (sec 10.1.1)
High temperature
38%
Unseasonal rain
28%
Storm / cyclone
16%
Drought
11%
Hailstorm
7%
Disease & pest types (sec 10.1.2)
Wax worms
44%
Ants
32%
Bee-eater birds
21%
Spiders
13%
Termites
9%
Pest management methods (sec 12)
68% adopt protection Β· 32% do not
Chemical spray
52%
Biological ctrl
31%
Electric trap
17%
Empty boxes (sec 11): 39% have unused hives
Adopt protection: 68%
Section 13 β€” Selling details 2021 Β· 2022 Β· 2023
Sales channels, prices and buyer companies
Channel mix 2021
Sec 13.1
Processing
35%
Retailer
27%
Consumer
20%
Local shop
13%
Fair
5%
Channel mix 2022
Sec 13.3
Processing
38%
Retailer
29%
Consumer
19%
Local shop
10%
Fair
4%
Channel mix 2023
Sec 13.5
Processing
42%
Retailer
28%
Consumer
18%
Local shop
8%
Fair
4%
Top honey processing buyers 2023 (sec 13.5.17)
% of honey sold to named companies
Patanjali
34%
Dabur
29%
Apis India
14%
Bharat Honey
10%
Emami
7%
Others
6%
Section 14 β€” Co-product selling details 2021 Β· 2022 Β· 2023
Beeswax Β· Pollen Β· Royal Jelly Β· Propolis Β· Venom
Co-product seller % by year
% of producers who sold each co-product
Co-product adoption 2021-2023.
Co-product sales channels (sec 14)
Where co-products are sold
Local shop
38%
Consumer direct
29%
Processing unit
19%
Private retailer
10%
Fair / expo
4%
Personal use (no sale): 18% of beeswax
Section 15 β€” Post-harvest grading & branding
Grading, packaging and brand quality
54%
Do post-harvest grading
31%
Machine grading
69%
Manual grading
3
Max branding tiers
Sec 15.3–15.5
Pack sizes sold (sec 15.3.4–6)
% of branded producers using each weight
500g jars
52%
1 kg jars
37%
250g jars
24%
Honey color grades sold (sec 15.3.7–12)
% of graded producers by color category
Yellow
61%
Reddish brown
28%
Dark brown
11%
Brand type distribution
Mustard honey
48%
Litchi honey
29%
Eucalyptus
14%
Sunflower
9%
Section 16 β€” Training & capacity building
Training coverage, topics and providers
58%
Received any training
44%
Pre-beekeeping trng
31%
During-activity trng
19%
Post-harvest trng
62%
Formal training
of trained producers
4.3 days
Avg training length
Training topics received (sec 16.1–16.4)
Production practices
67%
Pest & disease ctrl
54%
Apiary management
48%
Marketing & branding
39%
Co-product practices
28%
Training stage breakdown
Pre-beekeeping
44%
During activity
31%
Post-harvest
19%
Other activities
12%
Formal: 62%
Informal: 38%
Section 17 β€” Honey processing unit operations
Who operates their own processing unit
23%
Own processing unit
Sec 17
4,800 kg
Avg processing capacity
3,200 kg
Avg processed qty
67%
Capacity utilisation
β‚Ή14/kg
Avg processing cost
Selling place for processed honey (sec 17.1.4)
Private company
38%
Govt market
24%
Village haat
19%
eNAM portal
12%
Local agent
7%
Honey variety processed (sec 17.3)
Mustard
68%
Litchi
41%
Eucalyptus
22%
Sunflower
14%
Sections 19 Β· 20 β€” Export of honey and co-products
Within-state, interstate and international exports
18%
Export any produce
12%
Interstate sales
2.4%
International export
9%
Export beeswax
Sec 20
61%
Export by self
39%
Via agency
Honey export reach (sec 19)
Within state
62% of exporters
Interstate
38%
International
13%
Co-product export (sec 20)
Beeswax within UP
54%
Beeswax interstate
31%
Beeswax intl
15%
Sections 21 Β· 30 β€” Market competition & contract farming
Competition type, contracts and benefits
29%
Under contract
Sec 30
63%
Oral contract
37%
Written contract
74%
Report contract benefits
Market competition type (sec 21)
Price competition
52%
Quality competition
31%
Species / variety
13%
Other
4%
Contract benefits received (sec 30.5)
Increase production
58%
Farm income up
49%
Input cost down
38%
Quality control
34%
Tech support
27%
Sections 22 Β· 23 Β· 24 Β· 25 Β· 26 Β· 27 Β· 28 β€” Schemes, challenges & quality factors
Government support, obstacles and knowledge
Scheme awareness & benefit uptake (sec 22)
Among all 10,482 respondents
SchemeAwareRegisteredBenefit takenReach
National Beekeeping Mission72%48%31%High
Sweet Revolution (KVIC)61%34%22%Medium
Honey FPO (NAFED)44%19%12%Medium
KVK (Krishi Vigyan Kendra)55%28%18%Medium
Dev of Bee Breeders33%11%7%Low
MIDH (Horticulture)39%14%9%Low
Sphoorti (MSME)28%9%5%Very low
State Industrial Dev Mission24%7%4%Very low
Horticulture dept help types (sec 23)
Beekeeping boxes
47%
Branding/grading
28%
Processing unit
19%
Other help
14%
Major obstacles faced (sec 25)
Marketing problems
48%
High hive costs
41%
Lack of credit
36%
Agrochemicals
32%
Skill gap
28%
Bee escape
22%
Factors affecting honey production (sec 26)
Colony loss
62%
Colony migration
41%
Water source dry
27%
Factors affecting honey quality (sec 28)
Flower origin/age
58%
Pollen type
44%
Climate factors
39%
Production params
28%
Section 29 β€” Pollination services
Colonies rented out for pollination purposes
31%
Provide pollination
Extra income stream
48
Avg colonies rented
β‚Ή1,200
Avg rental / colony
2
Avg crop types served
Crop type pollinated (sec 29.1)
Fruit crops
54%
Flower crops
32%
Other crops
14%
Factors affecting bees (sec 27)
Mites
48%
Various viruses
34%
Bacterial infect.
24%
Fungal disease
17%
Multiple pests
11%
Section 31 β€” Variety-wise sales
Sales broken down by honey variety
68%
Report variety-wise sales
2.4
Avg varieties sold
5
Max variety slots (31.1–31.5)
β‚Ή248/kg
Highest variety avg price
Litchi honey
Volume share by variety (sec 31)
Mustard
48%
Litchi
22%
Eucalyptus
14%
Sunflower
9%
Mixed / other
7%
Average price per variety (Rs/kg)
Litchi
β‚Ή248
Eucalyptus
β‚Ή214
Sunflower
β‚Ή201
Mustard
β‚Ή179
Mixed
β‚Ή156
Complete variable reference β€” all 31 sections Β· 450+ fields
Search and explore every survey variable
S.NoVariableQuestionTypeSection
Total: 450+ variables
Sections: 31
Calculated fields: 24
Branching logic: 180+ fields